![]() ![]() A journal's editor may even want you to submit two versions of the revised manuscript: one with your changes highlighted along with a "clean" version. It's not unusual for a contributor to Polar Research, the journal I edit, to be asked to revise her or his submission three or four times before it's finally accepted.įirst, if the decision letter doesn't spell this out, find out if revisions in your submission should be highlighted and, if so, whether change-tracking, yellow highlighting or colored text is preferred. Please do not submit a paper with track changes, as track changes make the paper difficult for reviewers to read.Getting your work published in a peer-reviewed journal almost always involves revising your manuscript at least once. If the changes are too much, highlight the major additions to the paper. Lastly, please make sure to highlight the changes in the paper (or at least use a different font color). ![]() The response to reviewers should be uploaded as a “supplementary file,” in addition to being uploaded as a cover letter so that all reviewers will have access to the file. This should be accompanied by a point by point explanation of 1) how the previous comments from the reviewers were addressed and 2) how new results added to the paper make it stronger and increase the research contribution. In particular, please summarize the new results that have been added.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |